Home
Politics
The sample came from the remote Pilbara region of Western Australia, a site called Strelley Pool, where the microbes, after dying, had been finely preserved between quartz sand grains.
Pilbara has some of the planet's oldest rock formations, SET down in the so-called Archean Eon when the infant Earth was a primeval water world, with seas that were the temperature of a hot bath.
In 2002, another team of scientists, working in the same region just 35 kilometres (20 miles) away, said they had found bacteria fossils in the same formation.
But the claim was disputed, with some experts saying that the tiny pockmarks were not the signatures of once-living organisms but the result of mineralisation of the rocks.
Drawing on the latest electron microscopy and spectroscopy techniques, the authors of the new study say they have triple proof that their sample is biological in origin.
The microbes fed on sulphur compounds to survive, they believe.
The marks measure only about 10 millionths of a metre (0.0004 inches) long.
Their shape and clustering are not only consistent with bacterial cells, say the scientists.
They also have minute crystals of pyrite, an iron-and-sulphur compound also known as fool's gold, which are a clear by-product of metabolising sulphur and sulphates, according to their argument.
The team, led by David Wacey of the University of Western Australia, report the finding in the journal Nature Geoscience.
"At last we have good solid evidence for life over 3.4 billion years ago. It confirms there were bacteria at this time, living without oxygen," Martin Brasier, a professor at Oxford University, said in a press release.
Sulphur-loving bacteria "are still common today", said Brasier.
The bugs are found in smelly ditches and soil but also as "extremophiles" in hot springs and thermal vents in the deep ocean.
"Could these sorts of things exist on Mars? It's just about conceivable," said Brasier.
Robots or astronauts sent to the Red Planet could look at Pilbara-like sites to find out. However, their samples would have to undergo similar scrutiny to support beliefs that life has existed on Earth's enigmatic neighbour
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pilbara has some of the planet's oldest rock formations, SET down in the so-called Archean Eon when the infant Earth was a primeval water world, with seas that were the temperature of a hot bath.
In 2002, another team of scientists, working in the same region just 35 kilometres (20 miles) away, said they had found bacteria fossils in the same formation.
But the claim was disputed, with some experts saying that the tiny pockmarks were not the signatures of once-living organisms but the result of mineralisation of the rocks.
Drawing on the latest electron microscopy and spectroscopy techniques, the authors of the new study say they have triple proof that their sample is biological in origin.
The microbes fed on sulphur compounds to survive, they believe.
The marks measure only about 10 millionths of a metre (0.0004 inches) long.
Their shape and clustering are not only consistent with bacterial cells, say the scientists.
They also have minute crystals of pyrite, an iron-and-sulphur compound also known as fool's gold, which are a clear by-product of metabolising sulphur and sulphates, according to their argument.
The team, led by David Wacey of the University of Western Australia, report the finding in the journal Nature Geoscience.
"At last we have good solid evidence for life over 3.4 billion years ago. It confirms there were bacteria at this time, living without oxygen," Martin Brasier, a professor at Oxford University, said in a press release.
Sulphur-loving bacteria "are still common today", said Brasier.
The bugs are found in smelly ditches and soil but also as "extremophiles" in hot springs and thermal vents in the deep ocean.
"Could these sorts of things exist on Mars? It's just about conceivable," said Brasier.
Robots or astronauts sent to the Red Planet could look at Pilbara-like sites to find out. However, their samples would have to undergo similar scrutiny to support beliefs that life has existed on Earth's enigmatic neighbour
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
